Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Evolutionists' Challenge

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    976

    Evolutionists' Challenge

    Mutations have been induced and studied for decades...Science used to radiate fruit flies for many years, painstakingly going through the genome, pinpointing mutations in all the protein coding genes to see what types of morphological changes could be made in fly. To date, nothing new has formed. A duplication here or there....a rearrangement of pre-existing body parts.., etc.....likewise all the other scientific studies on mutations has yielded similar results: mutations can do things such as change pigmentation, eye color, fur color, etc, but as for morphological changes, they never add anything. No new eye parts, No new kidney parts, No new artery parts. No new kneecap parts, etc......never do mutations add anything new, nor are there any peer reviewed papers that claim mutations can add new information needed to generate such new anatomical features. This goes for any cellular machinery, any part of a bacteria, any part of an elephant, or any part of anything in between. All of biology is unaccounted for via mutation.

    Darwinism is nothing but horse manure masquerading as science....only meant to fool a percentage of the population who is either stupid, gullible, or both. You now have the chance to prove me wrong. good luck.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    679
    Quote Originally Posted by supersport View Post
    Mutations have been induced and studied for decades...Science used to radiate fruit flies for many years, painstakingly going through the genome, pinpointing mutations in all the protein coding genes to see what types of morphological changes could be made in fly. To date, nothing new has formed.
    You mean that nothing new has been beneficial to the fruit fly. Mutations were induced, therefore something new resulted. You have to understand that these studies are not attempting to build a super fruit fly, although in the back of their heads I'm sure they are secretly hoping for something. They are studying the process of mutation itself to better understand it.

    Quote Originally Posted by supersport View Post
    A duplication here or there....a rearrangement of pre-existing body parts.., etc.....likewise all the other scientific studies on mutations has yielded similar results: mutations can do things such as change pigmentation, eye color, fur color, etc, but as for morphological changes, they never add anything. No new eye parts, No new kidney parts, No new artery parts. No new kneecap parts, etc......never do mutations add anything new...
    There are countless examples of strange mutations resulting in new biological structures. But, we are contending with millions of years of evolution if we want to see something truly beneficial to a population of animals. Nature has refined animals to a point that major morphological mutations that actually result in a viable, competitive creature are extremely unlikely. Terrestrial animals have been of the same basic structure - four limbs, eyes above nose above mouth for hundreds of millions of years. Exception to this basic animal layout is very rare. What you see instead is very small refinements taking hold which allow animals to better withstand heat or cold, color variations, size variations, mouth and teeth changes, length of legs, etc, all because they are slightly better suited for a particular environment or food source. Evolution does not describe a process by which suddenly a cat is born with an extra eye or extra claws so that it can suddenly better catch its prey. This is a very typical problem religious people have with evolution because they lack the grasp of just how slow a process it is, how many generations take place, and how much time has gone into the vast diversity in life we see today.



    Quote Originally Posted by supersport View Post
    ... nor are there any peer reviewed papers that claim mutations can add new information needed to generate such new anatomical features. This goes for any cellular machinery, any part of a bacteria, any part of an elephant, or any part of anything in between.
    No, there may be no peer reviewed papers that claim to have created as such, but it is well established that mutations can add or subtract anatomical features. We have chicken with teeth, albeit resulting from the activating of buried genetic information resulting from millions of years evolutionary divergence with the chicken's reptile relatives.

    Quote Originally Posted by supersport View Post
    All of biology is unaccounted for via mutation.
    Exactly the opposite. Nothing makes sense without evolution. Have look at ERV mapping and its implications, vestigial features, legs on whales, viral evolution, unintelligent design, etc.


    Quote Originally Posted by supersport View Post
    Darwinism is nothing but horse manure masquerading as science....only meant to fool a percentage of the population who is either stupid, gullible, or both. You now have the chance to prove me wrong. good luck.
    First you need to understand the science, and obviously you don't. Even if you don't agree with it, at least make an attempt to understand it. I read Genesis, so it's the least you can do. If you ever read this, we can have a discussion.
    "Atheism is a religion like abstinence is a sex position" - Bill Maher

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •