Correct, that is new evidence.Furthermore the source Dane posted here (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/003931.htm) was not part of the evidence displayed in the thread in question: http://www.4forums.com/political/sho...&postcount=231
It is the entire articles. They show and explain the process by which the nerve signals reach the brain's cortex and thus begins a process of interaction accross the brain's cortex in a pattern that is known as brain waves.I'd also like to point out that Dane simply posted links to articles and did not provide areas of where to look to prove his/her point.
You agree with his misrepresentations and lies?I agree with Daewoo's view on the matter which I find to be convincing considering he never bothers to get into petty discussions like this.
Yes, please.I'm not quite sure how we get an official ruling on this, whether it be the admin or Kronus, but I'll look in to it and ask to review.
This is obviously a waste of time.
It is clear that Dane is just going to be a poster that is attacking.
Daewoo, steeeve, admin???? Anybody actually addressing my points here? Sure seems like steeve's accusation is falling flat on its face here.
So the conclusion stands. AFTER you were presented with evidence about brainwaves, you persisted in claiming they were found at 6 weeks, which made your claim a lie.