Obama's Justice Departments Justice; It's a farce!

[Archangel]

Here's the set up for this travesty of justice as exemplified by the Obama plan for stealing elections. We clearly see the intimidation when a Panther caries a baton in order to scare off potention voters who might oppose their choice for President.

YouTube - Voter Intimidation?

And here's the student referred to in the first video.

YouTube - "Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly

And here's the story about his Justice Department dropping the charges against the Black Panthers intimidating and threatening tactics during the last election.

Charges Against 'New Black Panthers' Dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
Three men were accused of trying to threaten voters and block poll and campaign workers by the threat of force -- one even brandishing what prosecutors call a deadly weapon.

Members of the New Black Panthers attend a rally outside the Lamar County Courthouse in Paris, Texas November 17, 2008.

The charges stemmed from an incident at a Philadelphia polling place on Election Day 2008 when three members of the party were accused of trying to threaten voters and block poll and campaign workers by the threat of force -- one even brandishing what prosecutors call a deadly weapon.

The three black panthers, Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were charged in a civil complaint in the final days of the Bush administration with violating the voter rights act by using coercion, threats and intimidation. Shabazz allegedly held a nightstick or baton that prosecutors said he pointed at people and menacingly tapped it. Prosecutors also say he "supports racially motivated violence against non-blacks and Jews."

The Obama administration won the case last month, but moved to dismiss the charges on May 15.

Click here to see FOX News video from the scene on election day.

Click to watch the incident on YouTube.

The complaint says the men hurled racial slurs at both blacks and whites.

A poll watcher who provided an affidavit to prosecutors in the case noted that Bartle Bull, who worked as a civil rights lawyer in the south in the 1960's and is a former campaign manager for Robert Kennedy, said it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever seen.

In his affidavit, obtained by FOX News, Bull wrote "I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters."

He also said they tried to "interfere with the work of other poll observers ... whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically," noting that one of the panthers turned toward the white poll observers and said "you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

A spokesman for the Department of Justice told FOX News, "The Justice Department was successful in obtaining an injunction that prohibits the defendant who brandished a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling place from doing so again. Claims were dismissed against the other defendants based on a careful assessment of the facts and the law. The department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote."

FOX News' Eric Shawn contributed to this report.

Charges Against 'New Black Panthers' Dropped by Obama Justice Dept. - Political News - FOXNews.com

[simone]

Until you can cite a more reliable source than Faux News ...

Bah Humbug!

[Archangel]

Originally Posted by simone

Until you can cite a more reliable source than Faux News ...

Bah Humbug!

Typical denial of reality. That is all I get from you. Can you prove one bit of info in the FOX Story is false in any way simone? Of course you can't. And FOX is easy enough to prove wrong with a simple google search. But you already know that and saw the number of stories beside FOX which reported this same information.

So here's another link for you to disregard because it tells the truth about your messiah.

Michelle Malkin Why is the Obama Justice Department protecting New Black Panthers?

Here's another:

Obama DOJ – now dismissing lawsuit won by default against the Black Panthers | Vote at your ask risk from now on | Fire Andrea Mitchell!

And another:

Fort Wayne News » Obama administration’s love affair with the New Black Panthers

Need more evidence simone, or will you just disregard it as you do all reality which conflicts with your preferred world view?

[CUNxTime]

Yeah, they definitely broke the law and the DoJ shouldn't be playing favorites like this...

[Accipiter]

I’ll look froward to hearing more about this but I won’t hold my breath.

[Archangel]

Originally Posted by Accipiter

I’ll look froward to hearing more about this but I won’t hold my breath.

More about what? Isn't 4 links with video proof of the intimidation in real time, enough evidence for you?

[simone]

Good grief! Archie! Do you really think I'm that stupid?

Michelle Malkin is a right wing tool.

Your second citing is a racist blog site.

Your third citing tries to pretend that it's a newspaper of some sort but it's another racist and right wing blog site.

You don't even know what "unbiased" means, do you?

[Accipiter]

So some stupid kid made a mistake, big deal.

simone is right the links you posted are a joke, amateurish at best.

It’s just testimony to the fact you are having trouble finding negative stuff to say about your president.

[Archangel]

Originally Posted by simone

Good grief! Archie! Do you really think I'm that stupid?

Michelle Malkin is a right wing tool.

Your second citing is a racist blog site.

Your third citing tries to pretend that it's a newspaper of some sort but it's another racist and right wing blog site.

You don't even know what "unbiased" means, do you?

Originally Posted by Accipiter

So some stupid kid made a mistake, big deal.

simone is right the links you posted are a joke, amateurish at best.

It’s just testimony to the fact you are having trouble finding negative stuff to say about your president.

I see, so what you're saying is that when the evidence is undeniable since it was captured on live video, and the fact that Obama's DOJ has dismissed the charges on the perpetrators, that you will fall back on the old stand by of condemning the sources once again.

You see my deniers of reality, what is without question is this real time video which you have and will continue to just ignore. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88m63...eature=related AND YouTube - "Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly Now dig a nice deep hole in order to bury your head real deep, ok?

And regarding your claim of bias, here is how it works in the real world. There are 2 schools of thought in every debate, and as is just a part of reality, those on the left don't often self criticize since you're not a very introspective people. So it is usually those of the conservative persuasion who will report on these glaring double standards and hypocrisies which your side so easily ignores and accepts as right and normal political activity.

If the law is broken by members of your alliance, you very easily will give them a pass or simply ignore when it is pointed out to you. But if my side just gives the appearance of impropriety, your side wont quit until you make a federal offense out of it. And that's the way it is when we are dealing with a people who determine what is right and wrong according to their own political agenda and not according to what is moral or ethical in reality.

[Accipiter]

Originally Posted by Archangel

I see, so what you're saying is that when the evidence is undeniable since it was captured on live video, and the fact that Obama's DOJ has dismissed the charges on the perpetrators, that you will fall back on the old stand by of condemning the sources once again.

No, what I am saying is it’s not the big deal you want us to think it is.

All one has to do is look at the quality of the sites you referenced to see just how trivial it is.

[Penfold]

Originally Posted by Accipiter

No, what I am saying is it’s not the big deal you want us to think it is.

All one has to do is look at the quality of the sites you referenced to see just how trivial it is.

The track record of the messenger is itself sufficient.

[CUNxTime]

It was video taped. Dudes with bats intimidating people at the polling station.
This kind of behavior is wrong REGARDLESS of the race of the people doing it. You can't stand in front of the polls with a nightstick. Period.

[Archangel]

Originally Posted by CUNxTime

It was video taped. Dudes with bats intimidating people at the polling station.
This kind of behavior is wrong REGARDLESS of the race of the people doing it. You can't stand in front of the polls with a nightstick. Period.

You can if your a Black Panther Obamanite according to these radical leftists. It's only if a conservative did something like that, that it would be considered fascism.

[foundit66]

Originally Posted by simone

Good grief! Archie! Do you really think I'm that stupid?
Michelle Malkin is a right wing tool.
Your second citing is a racist blog site.
Your third citing tries to pretend that it's a newspaper of some sort but it's another racist and right wing blog site.
You don't even know what "unbiased" means, do you?

Sure he does.
If gays use it, it must be biased.
If Archie likes what he hears, they must be blessed by God speaking the gospel!

Originally Posted by Archie

You can if your a Black Panther Obamanite according to these radical leftists.

Archie, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that these Black Panther members had any support from Obama.
I guess the minute Obama took office, everything that happened after (and even before) is all his fault...

[Accipiter]

Originally Posted by CUNxTime

It was video taped. Dudes with bats intimidating people at the polling station.
This kind of behavior is wrong REGARDLESS of the race of the people doing it. You can't stand in front of the polls with a nightstick. Period.

What do you think would be an appropriate punishment for the guy with a night stick?