On the other hand.. if you don't take Paul's words as circular (trying to prove the bible with the bible', HE does talk about meeting people who met...
I am so sorry that rather go and address the points, you attack the person. This has totally ruined all credibility you ever have and ever will have....
Yet, the argument (not evidence) is circular in nature.. because they are merely modifying what is there to convince themselves. That isn't evidence....
Yet, even among the scholars , there is not universal agreement. Now, how about addressing my argument, rather than do the 'oh, all these people say...
When it comes to the historical Jesus.. my position is not that he did or did not exist, but rather the evidence presented is horribly corrupted, and...
"Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." — Isaac Asimov