Actually it makes perfect sense. And you have not shown how Dane is inconsistent. Someone who sees another self proclaimed believer defiling their religion, spreading lies, false information and deceit in the name of their religion will get ###### off. Muslims regularly threaten each other over it and sometimes kill each other for allegedly defiling Islam.I'm not delusional and have shown above how inconsistent Dane is in his beliefs and his condemnation of me as a so called fellow christian. It makes no sense that one who claims to be a christian would so adamantly hate another self professed believer in and follower of Christ.
Which doesn't prove he's not a Christian. You have never dealt with your dishonest tactic of implying your interpretation = Christianity. In fact you always ran from that point. One recent thread you stated I attacked you for your interpretation where I actually stated your tying was dishonest. You never returned to that thread.Let Dane simply support his christian beliefs by explaining what it is he believes that is biblically based. I submit he can't do that because the only beliefs he has ever defended here, other than demanding that he is a christian, is his belief and defense in evolution which exists in opposition to any belief in the biblical creation account.
Just because one doesn't accept literal creation does not make them no longer a Christian.
A false belief system? Notice that you have completely failed to support such an attack and when faced with arguments for why your belief is true, your arguments are either non-existent or "don't know, therefore Goddidit"So I submit to you that it is those who cling to that false belief system that are the truly delusional victims of a man made fairy tale, and not the creationists who give an intelligent being credit for creating the organized chain of life that exists.
The main point is, while your assumption about the theistic beliefs of Dane were wrong, stupid, ignorant and based on nothing, that doesn't make you a liar in that regard, just wrong and should have taught you that assuming is hardly a valid way of making good arguments, especially when you have nothing concrete to build the assumption on.