|
PRO |
Political Debates and Polls Forum |
CON |
| Shotgun News Magazine Subscription | People Magazine |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|||
|
Deep Puncture Wound Protocol
What's the scoop here?
It seems to me with all the shootings that occur in the United States because of all the gun happy nuts running around, everyone would know how to do first aid at the site of a shooting. I understand bullet wounds are kind of nasty because they're deep. There's also the massive loss of blood; To be sure, the massive bleeding would wash out nasty debris but a body can't stand to lose a bunch of blood.
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan “War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Shootings do not happen because of gun happy nuts running around. Nobody has ever been injured anywhere by any gun happy nut running around. Many have been injured by criminals who disobey the law. As far as puncture wounds, do stabbings count? Or, as it appears, are you only concerned with those caused by firearms?
__________________
"A neoconservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality." - Irving Kristol |
|
|||
|
Quote:
How many stab wounds are there, relative to gun wounds, in the U.S.?
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan “War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I always find it amusing. Liberals put on a great show about caring so much about saving lives and making things better. But when confronted with the fact that there's more than one way to murder people in a crime, they claim that the other methods don't matter as much because not as many people die. So is it that you really don't care about saving the lives of innocent people? Or is it that just not enough people are currently dying from stabbings and beatings for you to care? What is it, do you have a death quota to fill or something?
__________________
[QUOTE=Brady;363469]When I was a kid I did lots of things like playing with fire and torturing animals even though adults told me not to.[/QUOTE] The admission of a sociopathic serial killer. [QUOTE=Penfold;363126]No Personal attacks, insults, name calling, offensive generalizations, or labeling.[/QUOTE] He should practice what he preaches. The three duties of government: 1. Protect property 2. preserve contracts 3. provide for the rule of law. |
|
|||
|
Actually, if you really want to save lives, there are more people injured by blunt force trauma than any bodily penetration you can come up with, bullets, knives, broken bottles, ice picks, you name it.
You really want to stop the senseless violence? Get rid of sticks, rocks, golf clubs, baseball bats, candlesticks, frying pans, and drunk husband's fists.
__________________
"A neoconservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality." - Irving Kristol |
|
||||
|
Yes trauma to organs and arteries,but no one really mentioned infection,even though the bullet its self is sterile there's still dirt on the skin and bits of cloth
entering with the bullet.Even a minor wound can be just as fatal,only slower. Though Timone did mention nasty debris |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The thing about a gun is that it can be concealed and whipped out in a moment. I hate cowards like that who are sneaky and don't give any visible warnings. Also, a person has a change to run from those other things, admiittedly, a tossed rock can do damage, and if your opponent is especially hefty, a frying pan might fly a goodly distance, but it's the pure cowardly aspect of whipping out a gun that angers me, having a considerable advantage at a considerable distance.
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan “War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar |
|
|||
|
I dunno. What is the scoop here? You complain about the responses we give, and yet you keep coming back for more. Even people with down syndrome learn enough to only stick their hands in the open flame once.
Quote:
Quote:
Of course knife wounds are far worse. You've got a small hole versus a deep gash that'll cut arteries and organs in its path. Quote:
And what does this little blurb of yours have to do with anything?
__________________
[QUOTE=Brady;363469]When I was a kid I did lots of things like playing with fire and torturing animals even though adults told me not to.[/QUOTE] The admission of a sociopathic serial killer. [QUOTE=Penfold;363126]No Personal attacks, insults, name calling, offensive generalizations, or labeling.[/QUOTE] He should practice what he preaches. The three duties of government: 1. Protect property 2. preserve contracts 3. provide for the rule of law. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sometimes I'm certain that your elevator has never seen the penthouse. ![]()
__________________
"The problem with Socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money." - Margaret Thatcher "We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there's trouble in Massachusetts, there's trouble everywhere -- and now they know it." Senator Scott Brown (R MA) |
|
||||
|
Now that is a certain fact!
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents. If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem. Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail. |
|
|||
|
Where were you when we discussed this TWICE previously?
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents. If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem. Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|