PRO

Political Debates and Polls Forum

CON


Go Back   4Forums.com Political Debates and Polls > Topics > Gay Rights Debates

Court upholds Boseman adoption: Originally Posted by QuackAttack1887 ...How? I explained my opinion and how I didn't know what any of your other examples were. you either want that loose standard of good parenting applied to all.. or you ...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Robb Report Magazine Subscription People Magazine
  #151 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 02:29 AM
mosheh.org
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuackAttack1887 View Post
...How? I explained my opinion and how I didn't know what any of your other examples were.
you either want that loose standard of good parenting applied to all..

or you want it applied to just gay parents.


which is it?

-Mosheh Thezion
Reply With Quote
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 03:07 AM
QuackAttack1887's Avatar
Gay Pride Girl
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 135
Send a message via AIM to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via MSN to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via Yahoo to QuackAttack1887
basically, if they'll be a good parent, then they should at least be able to foster them, bikers, gay people, purple people.
Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 03:19 AM
mosheh.org
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuackAttack1887 View Post
basically, if they'll be a good parent, then they should at least be able to foster them, bikers, gay people, purple people.
And so.. who is not worthy? if anyone.???

Or are all welcome?


-Mosheh Thezion
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 03:22 AM
QuackAttack1887's Avatar
Gay Pride Girl
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 135
Send a message via AIM to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via MSN to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via Yahoo to QuackAttack1887
any person with enough money to raise a child, enough love, and the usual parenting stuff. i'm not a parent and the parents i see are either really bad at it or too good at it for it to be true.
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 05:35 AM
Matthew S's Avatar
Gay Crusader
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,217
Send a message via Yahoo to Matthew S
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12 View Post
I should have clarified my question. Show me that the majority of gay partnerships practice monogomy. IMO, it is essential to raising a child.
So you are saying that the child will be involved in the sex act? Since heterosexuals that adopt children are not always monogamous and their monogamy is never brought into adoption cases.
__________________
Welcome to the USA. You do not get to make your religion my problem---Jitobear


“While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do. Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans. It’s about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect.”

— Senator Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 06:10 AM
Easyrider's Avatar
Till the Lord Returns
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazyjason View Post
You know there is no reasoning with any of your kind. Just bury your head in the sand and keep preaching and believing your ridiculous hate filled message.
Nothing hate-filled about it. I'mk trying to turn people to repentance and salvation. But obviously you're full of hatred and, instead of repenting, you rededicate yourself to propping up the illicit gay lifestyle, defending iniquity at every turn, and leading other people astray.

Your pro-gay thing is your idol. You're not preaching Jesus Christ, you're preaching your pro-gay immorality.
__________________
"For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries." (NASA Astronomer Robert Jastrow, God and the Astronomers, p. 116.)
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 09:26 AM
QuackAttack1887's Avatar
Gay Pride Girl
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 135
Send a message via AIM to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via MSN to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via Yahoo to QuackAttack1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easyrider View Post
Nothing hate-filled about it. I'm trying to turn people to repentance and salvation. But obviously you're full of hatred and, instead of repenting, you rededicate yourself to propping up the illicit gay lifestyle, defending iniquity at every turn, and leading other people astray.

Your pro-gay thing is your idol. You're not preaching Jesus Christ, you're preaching your pro-gay immorality.
I can't speak for Jason, but I know one of the worst parts is when people tell me when I'm a sinner and save me. It's great you have your religion and morals, it seriously is. But that doesn't make it okay for you or others to try and 'save me'. As a kid, I went to church and Sunday School and all that. I never bought into the beliefs I were taught. After some incidents before my confirmation, I decided to leave the church after my confirmation.

Being gay is not a sin. It is not a choice. When you sin, you choose to do it. You have no choice in being gay.
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 09:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosheh Thezion View Post
you either want that loose standard of good parenting applied to all..

or you want it applied to just gay parents.


which is it?

-Mosheh Thezion
It's not a "loose standard" at all to allow capable gay couples to adopt. It may be in the best interests of the child, depending on the couple. The fact that they are the same sex has no bearing on their ability to be good parents.
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 09:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easyrider View Post
Nothing hate-filled about it. I'mk trying to turn people to repentance and salvation. But obviously you're full of hatred and, instead of repenting, you rededicate yourself to propping up the illicit gay lifestyle, defending iniquity at every turn, and leading other people astray.

Your pro-gay thing is your idol. You're not preaching Jesus Christ, you're preaching your pro-gay immorality.
Who's to say your idol is not gay exclusion? Jesus Christ himself never says gay people are to be excluded. He didn't talk about "the gay lifestyle", whatever that meaningless abstraction of a term is.
Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 10:56 AM
jazyjason's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easyrider View Post
Nothing hate-filled about it. I'mk trying to turn people to repentance and salvation. But obviously you're full of hatred and, instead of repenting, you rededicate yourself to propping up the illicit gay lifestyle, defending iniquity at every turn, and leading other people astray.

Your pro-gay thing is your idol. You're not preaching Jesus Christ, you're preaching your pro-gay immorality.
I am not full of hatred Easy that is why the plight of the destitute and the oppressed concern me in every manner. Those who are murdered or beaten or demonized for who they are, for something they cannot change, only because their love of another human being is somehow different from yours.

You are trying to turn others to what you believe is repentance but your methods are flawed. Calling people "morally corrupt" or their love "illicit" just shows how narrow your views are.

Being gay I must restate is NOT a lifestyle. A lifestyle is a choice a definition of one's self based upon influence. Being gay has many variations of people living in many different ways. Being gay is just as diverse as being strait.

And Easy you are not preaching the core message of Christ. Christ EMBRACED the sinner! Christ embraced the prostitute, the blind, the down trodden, he cared for the oppressed, the little man, those who had no voice and were shunned because of WHO THEY WERE. THAT is the message of Christ Easy. Unconditional nonjudgmental unbiased love. What you preach and what you post is NOTHING even close to that of the message of Christ whatsoever.
__________________
"I have no desire to tear you down or to condemn you or your faith in Christ. "

"What a joke; It takes nerve for a couple of anti-christian reprobates to start criticizing believers."

"Or to claim to understand the nature or character of Jesus. If you two had a clue about Jesus teachings, you wouldn't be opposing them with every fiber of your beings."

-Archangel

"Disagreeing with you does not make someone anti-Christian, Archangel, it makes them anti-nutjob." - Jo Bennett
Reply With Quote
  #161 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 11:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosheh Thezion View Post
then...

would you say the state should allow members of NAMBLA TO ADOPT?

how about lucifarian satanists?

how about jacket wearing hells angels?

how about revolutionary rebels... who want to over throw the state?
The Hells Angels are an instution of organized crime and NAMBLA is group that advocates for and often engages in the criminal act of child molestation. There should be no religious litmus test before allowing people to adopt. Comparing homosexuals to criminals speaks volumes about you. You are not the well-reasoned, tolerant person you think you are.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Easyrider View Post
defending iniquity at every turn.
Nearly choked on my morning water (don't do coffee) here. I am sorry, but a religion that only allows intimacy and love for those who are lucky enough to be born with a certain sexual orientation has no business bitching about the iniquity in others.

The god you worship is an a$$hole. The message you send about gays is hateful and hurtful. How you can worship something that does damage is beyond me. I certainly would not hold my deity to lower standards than I hold myself.
__________________
“But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most? ” ~ Mark Twain

"Those who are easily shocked... should be shocked more often" ~ Mae West
Reply With Quote
  #162 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 07:31 PM
JPSartre12's Avatar
Healthcare- I gots mine
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 8,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by gayhumanist View Post
That really shouldn't be the question. It ought to be good enough that the couple that wants to reaise a child practices monogamy, whether that couple is gay or straight. Statistics for the group they belong to, which are pretty difficult to gather honestly anyway, shouldn't prevent an otherwise worthy couple from adopting a kid. Now, you may say that wasn't the argument you were trying to make. So, if that's true, what are you trying to do? Are you simply attempting to judge gay people as a group, to make generalizations? Let's see. Should it turn out gay people are generally more monogamous, will you say we are worthy, equal human beings? However, if it turns out heterosexuals are more monogamous, does that mean gay people, as individuals should not have rights?
I believe that my question was pretty self-evident. I agreed that gays can make good parents as long as they didn't maintain a poor example to their kids....same goes for straights. Promiscuous straights or gays should not be allowed to adopt kids.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jazyjason View Post
You shouldn't NEED to be shown anything. Statistics showing people are even gay are inaccurate since so many are in the closet or being forced to live double lives.

It is interesting to note that, you do not call upon evidence showing STRAIT couples practicing monogamy. I guess it's a double standard or another way to judge a group of people in a subtle manner.
Before you get your panties in a wad, read the response above.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew S View Post
So you are saying that the child will be involved in the sex act? Since heterosexuals that adopt children are not always monogamous and their monogamy is never brought into adoption cases.
In my opinion, the morality of the prospective parents is paramount regardless of their sexual orientation. The fact that straights aren't always monogomous is no reason to give carte blanche to other unhealthy relationships.
__________________
"The problem with Socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money."
- Margaret Thatcher

"We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there's trouble in Massachusetts, there's trouble everywhere -- and now they know it." Senator Scott Brown (R MA)
Reply With Quote
  #163 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 07:42 PM
mosheh.org
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by jitobear View Post
The Hells Angels are an instution of organized crime and NAMBLA is group that advocates for and often engages in the criminal act of child molestation. There should be no religious litmus test before allowing people to adopt. Comparing homosexuals to criminals speaks volumes about you. You are not the well-reasoned, tolerant person you think you are.

so...

you believe the people.. and sub-culture people affliliate themselves with should be a measure of their worth as potential parents????

ahh... thats what you just infired...

which... since gay parents... affiliate with a gay subculture which is having wild loose sex... as part of their sub-culture of sexual freedom...

why is that less worse.. than drug dealing gang members?


drug dealing... is just business...

loose sex in bathrooms, and parks.. is not something you.. can even justify.


Or will you try to defend the gay sub-culture?

and suggest having loose gay sex with strange men, is better than dealing drugs?

oh please try.... say its better.. go ahead.

-Mosheh Thezion
Reply With Quote
  #164 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 07:50 PM
JPSartre12's Avatar
Healthcare- I gots mine
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 8,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by jitobear View Post
The Hells Angels are an instution of organized crime and NAMBLA is group that advocates for and often engages in the criminal act of child molestation. There should be no religious litmus test before allowing people to adopt. Comparing homosexuals to criminals speaks volumes about you. You are not the well-reasoned, tolerant person you think you are.



Nearly choked on my morning water (don't do coffee) here. I am sorry, but a religion that only allows intimacy and love for those who are lucky enough to be born with a certain sexual orientation has no business bitching about the iniquity in others.

The god you worship is an a$$hole. The message you send about gays is hateful and hurtful. How you can worship something that does damage is beyond me. I certainly would not hold my deity to lower standards than I hold myself.
Nice to see you, Jito. I don't agree with any of the drivel above, but it's always nice to see you.
__________________
"The problem with Socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money."
- Margaret Thatcher

"We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there's trouble in Massachusetts, there's trouble everywhere -- and now they know it." Senator Scott Brown (R MA)
Reply With Quote
  #165 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 08:47 PM
QuackAttack1887's Avatar
Gay Pride Girl
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 135
Send a message via AIM to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via MSN to QuackAttack1887 Send a message via Yahoo to QuackAttack1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosheh Thezion View Post
so...

you believe the people.. and sub-culture people affliliate themselves with should be a measure of their worth as potential parents????

ahh... thats what you just infired...

which... since gay parents... affiliate with a gay subculture which is having wild loose sex... as part of their sub-culture of sexual freedom...

why is that less worse.. than drug dealing gang members?


drug dealing... is just business...

loose sex in bathrooms, and parks.. is not something you.. can even justify.


Or will you try to defend the gay sub-culture?

and suggest having loose gay sex with strange men, is better than dealing drugs?

oh please try.... say its better.. go ahead.

-Mosheh Thezion
You're generalizing and stereotyping here. Neither me, nor any of my gay friends have 'loose gay sex'. Just like with straight people, and you, assuming you have a significant other.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0