PRO

Political Debates and Polls Forum

CON


Go Back   4Forums.com Political Debates and Polls > Topics > Gay Rights Debates

It Seems Those Penguins Weren't So Gay After All...: Originally Posted by CUNxTime Well, we'll call them Bi-Sexual if that'll make you happy lol. My point is, rats (part of nature) will have homosexual relationships. Not all of them did but several participated. Touche' ...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Robb Report Magazine Subscription People Magazine
  #121 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 01:57 AM
Steamroller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUNxTime View Post
Well, we'll call them Bi-Sexual if that'll make you happy lol. My point is, rats (part of nature) will have homosexual relationships. Not all of them did but several participated.
Touche' Must have been an interesting project!
__________________
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #122 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 02:59 AM
Steamroller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
You're shooting the messenger.
They're just repeating the observations of others.

I knew you weren't interested in education, but to ignore the issue so blatantly is absurd.
No matter.
Your ignorance is being surpassed by real people's education in the rest of the world.

While you stick your hands over your ears and insist you don't want to listen, society changes around you.
The dinosaurs stuck in the tar pits will not be missed...
I was going to answer your previous post but have chosen not to after reading this one.

I can't believe you call that report from MSNBC anything but a "puff" piece for the homosexual lifestyle.

Referring to my belief as ignorance because its different from yours is indeed rich. And then you have the audacity to refer to others considering themelves as superior.

Regardless of your opinion of my intelligence, I assure you I am a real person.

You don't seem to understand. I don't have my hands over my ears. I disagree with your view that homosexual is normal and and should have unabstructed rights within our society.

Let me be crystal clear. If you want to be gay, then by all means be gay. But in my opinion, this country would be well served, if you did so knowing that certain restrictions would then be applied to your life, not on mine.

Earlier you stated four situations and asked my stance. I answered them sufficiently and you started playing with words. I expect you to attack my spelling if this continues much longer.

One of the problems the gay community is always going to have with people like me is your image. Lets just start with Castro street in San Francisco, "Pride Fest" in Milwaukee, the Gay District in Houston, or the filth in New Oleans. Like it or not, that is where YOUR voice is being heard from, and that IS your problem, not mine.

BTW, in the end, I will not win this arguement. Prophesy clearly states that your side wins.., for a season.
__________________
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #123 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 03:22 AM
Big_Bear_Scot's Avatar
Com'on the Scotland
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller View Post
You don't seem to understand. I don't have my hands over my ears. I disagree with your view that homosexual is normal and and should have unabstructed rights within our society.


Let me be crystal clear. If you want to be gay, then by all means be gay. But in my opinion, this country would be well served, if you did so knowing that certain restrictions would then be applied to your life, not on mine.
I don't see why giving gays equal rights infringes on yours. No one is forcing you to marry a man. I am not gay but I believe in small Government(or preferably no Government), Government in no way should be interfering in the private lives of their citizens and that includes how that persons marries.

What I don't understand is that most opposition comes from so called Conservatives who believe in small government. They believe that Government should not infringe civil liberties such as gun ownership. But when it comes to comes to Gay marriage they want Big Government to enforce their personal morality into Law.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller View Post
One of the problems the gay community is always going to have with people like me is your image. Lets just start with Castro street in San Francisco, "Pride Fest" in Milwaukee, the Gay District in Houston, or the filth in New Oleans. Like it or not, that is where YOUR voice is being heard from, and that IS your problem, not mine.
Mmm Just look at the filth and happens in New Orleans during Madi Gras. Men give beads if a women flashes her breasts in public. Do you have problem with this? What about spring break? When tonnes of college kids go to the beaches, party, get drunk and have sex. This is all done by heterosexuals.

If you believe that because of the image of Gay's in certain Cities is a reason for denying equal rights then I think we should really considering banning all marriages(straight or otherwise)
__________________
Is there for honest Poverty
That hings his head, and a' that;
The coward-slave, we pass him by,
We dare be poor for a 'that!
For a ' that and a' that,
Our toils obscure, and a 'that,
The rank is but the guinea's stamp,
The Man's the gowd for a 'that.

A Man's A Man for A' That - Rabbie Burns
Reply With Quote
  #124 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 03:49 AM
Steamroller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Bear_Scot View Post
I don't see why giving gays equal rights infringes on yours. No one is forcing you to marry a man. I am not gay but I believe in small Government(or preferably no Government), Government in no way should be interfering in the private lives of their citizens and that includes how that persons marries.

What I don't understand is that most opposition comes from so called Conservatives who believe in small government. They believe that Government should not infringe civil liberties such as gun ownership. But when it comes to comes to Gay marriage they want Big Government to enforce their personal morality into Law.



Mmm Just look at the filth and happens in New Orleans during Madi Gras. Men give beads if a women flashes her breasts in public. Do you have problem with this? What about spring break? When tonnes of college kids go to the beaches, party, get drunk and have sex. This is all done by heterosexuals.

If you believe that because of the image of Gay's in certain Cities is a reason for denying equal rights then I think we should really considering banning all marriages(straight or otherwise)
I appreciate your post and do not mean to blow you off. Most of what you raise has been discussed thoughout this thread. If you read some of the previous posts and repost, I'll answer you directly.
__________________
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #125 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 04:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 115
Have you ever been to the castro? its one of the most harmless places in san francisco where gay and straight get along just great. The annual castro street fair is where many people take their kids and don't go back home any worse for the wear.

I strongly reccomend you taking a field trip to any gay community (they exist in every major city) and see for yourself, ya know instead of solely deciding on cherry picked video clips and ither peoples account. You have a problem with mardi gras because of gays?

Next thing you are going to tell me is that lesbian porn should be banned because of all the lesbians who purchase it.
Reply With Quote
  #126 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 04:06 AM
foundit66's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,913
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller View Post
I was going to answer your previous post but have chosen not to after reading this one.
I can't believe you call that report from MSNBC anything but a "puff" piece for the homosexual lifestyle.
I can't believe you think saying "puff piece" is an intelligent criticism.
Oh wait. You aren't interested in intelligent criticism.
You're just looking for an excuse to dismiss...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
Referring to my belief as ignorance because its different from yours is ...
Is just plain wrong.
I explained where you showed ignorance.
You refuse to honestly address what I said.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
Regardless of your opinion of my intelligence, I assure you I am a real person.
On that I have no doubt.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
You don't seem to understand. I don't have my hands over my ears. I disagree with your view that homosexual is normal and and should have unabstructed rights within our society.


You call it a "puff piece"?
Why don't you do your own research for yourself?
Google information FROM THE SOURCE for people who have researched gay animals if you like.
You are looking for an excuse to dismiss gay animals, and you found a really flimsy one.
THAT is where your hands are over your ears.

Your capability to repeat *homosexual is not normal* is part of the routine where somebody repeats some nonsense as they have their hands over their ears...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
I disagree with your view that homosexual is normal and and should have unabstructed rights within our society.
"unobstructed rights"?
We should have equal rights.
Like I pointed out (and you're obviously going to duck that issue too), you are incredibly intolerant by insisting that gays should not have equal rights.
By insisting that gays limit themselves in ways that straights do not.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
Let me be crystal clear. If you want to be gay, then by all means be gay. But in my opinion, this country would be well served, if you did so knowing that certain restrictions would then be applied to your life, not on mine.
Why is it that people like you think that saying we can "be gay" is somehow a great favor to us?
Quite frankly, I think the fact that you throw that out there says something negative about your side...

Furthermore, don't confuse your prejudice with the interests of this country.
This country has a majority support for EVERY issue of gay equality, with ONLY one exception.
Gay marriage. That's it.
And even on that, you guys are losing ground. Several years ago, you had a two-to-one advantage.
Now, you can barely claim a majority.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
Earlier you stated four situations and asked my stance. I answered them sufficiently and you started playing with words. I expect you to attack my spelling if this continues much longer.
I asked your stance cause I knew your claim of "tolerance" was with a bald-faced lie or your own willful self-delusion.
THAT was the point of asking those questions.
I am not "playing with words", but pointing out the reality of your position.

The fact that you cannot defend your stance is not my fault, nor my problem.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
One of the problems the gay community is always going to have with people like me is your image. Lets just start with Castro street in San Francisco, "Pride Fest" in Milwaukee, the Gay District in Houston, or the filth in New Oleans. Like it or not, that is where YOUR voice is being heard from, and that IS your problem, not mine.
We can start with any of those.
Have you ever actually ATTENDED a pride parade?
I would guess not.

Now I agree there are SOME INDIVIDUALS who walk around and behave incredibly poorly. But they are the exception and not the rule.
The vast majority of the parade is people walking around like any other parade. Most of the parade is taken up by political groups carrying banners, or politicians / companies showing their support for gays.
People like you fixate on the people behaving badly, and refuse to recognize that it is STILL not the usual part of the crowd.

And the really funny thing about all this?
Gays are still winning.
You think that it's such a huge problem for us, but opinion polls continue to shift our way. Majority support on every issue with ONE exception, and you keep losing numbers on gay marriage.

Sounds like that "problem" ain't that big in the first place...

You know what is a "problem" for your side of the fence?
People like you incapable of actually discussing this issue, and instead just trying to insist that gays should limit our lives for your comfort level.
There's a thread around here where I keep piling on various examples of the "anti-gay" crowd who lie about gays and the issues.
THAT is a real problem for your side of the fence.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamroller
BTW, in the end, I will not win this arguement. Prophesy clearly states that your side wins.., for a season.
"for a season"?
If you think you're referencing the Democratic majority and waiting on a Republican majority replacement, you're deluding yourself.

Part of this population shift is occurring WITHIN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY ITSELF. The Republican VOTERS are shifting to have majority support for gays as well.
There is majority support amongst Republican voters for gays in the military, ENDA, and gay hate crime legislation.

The Republican politicians cater too much to the extremists, and I think that is why they lose the votes, but that's another "tar pit" situation as the old Republicans get voted out, and newer Republicans WHO RECOGNIZE what their constituency wants get voted in.

There is nothing "seasonal" about this.
__________________
"Speak up; for he that withholds his opinion shall inherit the winds of tyranny"
*** www.politicalwrinkles.com
"Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution.
You did not place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."
*** Jamie Raskin
Reply With Quote
  #127 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 07:58 AM
Archangel's Avatar
The Sword of TRUTH
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the presence of the Master:
Posts: 10,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Mojo View Post
Have you ever been to the castro? its one of the most harmless places in san francisco where gay and straight get along just great. The annual castro street fair is where many people take their kids and don't go back home any worse for the wear.

I strongly reccomend you taking a field trip to any gay community (they exist in every major city) and see for yourself, ya know instead of solely deciding on cherry picked video clips and ither peoples account. You have a problem with mardi gras because of gays?

Next thing you are going to tell me is that lesbian porn should be banned because of all the lesbians who purchase it.
Really?

Michelle Malkin Anti-Prop. 8 Mob Watch: Christians in San Francisco’s Castro district

YouTube - Castro District Gays Attack A Christian Missionary

And here's more on their allegedly harmless militance, according to you. Or do you just see what you want to see.

Militant homosexuality and anti-Prop 8 efforts Northern Thoughts And Reflections

And regarding the Castro Street Fair, sure, it's family fair all around, right!!!
Flopping Aces » Blog Archive San Francisco/San FranSicko a Decaying American City – Masturbate-a-Thon [Reader Post]
__________________
If god made human from dirt, how come there are still dirt around? ~ [obvious_child]

You know what, Archie is right. Evolution is a total scam. ~ [obvious_child]

If the universe were not as it is, it would be different. ~ [Penfold]

A great civilization is not conquered from without, until it destroys itself from within. ~ Durant

Last edited by Archangel; 07-19-2009 at 08:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #128 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 08:38 AM
CUNxTime's Avatar
Truth & Soul
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stratosphere baby Stratosphere!
Posts: 2,047
[quote]Ok, first off, violence is bad and violent gays hurt their cause as much as violent people hurt any cause they support. However, I doubt I could come stand in front of YOUR church for 3 years (that's how long the woman said they've been going there) and demean and degrade Christianity and condemn you and your fellow parishioners without someone getting upset with me and shooing me outta there. Like any minority (perhaps one of the last truly oppressed minorities in the US) gays get touchy when they feel people are 'invading' their neighborhood. And for good reason. There is a real problem of 'gay bashing'.

Quote:
And here's more on their allegedly harmless militance, according to you. Or do you just see what you want to see.

Militant homosexuality and anti-Prop 8 efforts Northern Thoughts And Reflections
Ok, your first links are about Christians going into gay neighborhoods and basically trying to convert gays from their sinning lifestyle. Now your third link is about how its the GAYS who....


Quote:
....have harassed religious groups in the past, we can discuss how they have forced their “lifestyle” down our throats for the last few years.....
Awkward!!

Quote:
And regarding the Castro Street Fair, sure, it's family fair all around, right!!!
Flopping Aces » Blog Archive San Francisco/San FranSicko a Decaying American City – Masturbate-a-Thon [Reader Post]
Ok, well...yeah not my cup of tea. But what people do behind closed doors is their business and I'm not willing to force my sensibilities on what consenting adults do.
__________________
-Computer $1500.00
-Monthly internet connection $35.00
-Monthly electricity bill $245.00
-Convincing a Socialist that incentive is the mother of motivation,

Priceless!
Reply With Quote
  #129 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 08:54 AM
JPSartre12's Avatar
Healthcare- I gots mine
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 8,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
You obviously define "normal / not normal" by a simple "majority / minority" classification...
By which logic, red-headedness, genius IQs, and left-handed people are obviously "not normal".

Your question a) is as relevant as asking why there aren't more left-handed people.

Question b) is based on pure population growth, driving an increase in homosexuals cause there are more people.
Answer a) If homosexuality was the norm, the majority of us would be homosexual.
Answer b) the population of people on earth would be dropping since homosexuals don't reproduce naturally.
Quote:

And thus the obfuscation begins.
These two didn't have any predators in the zoo.
Can you really show any example of how penguin pairs try to help one another (based on PAIR relationship scenarios) in the wild?
No. You can't.
Cause you're just making up stupid junk at this stage to ignore what they're doing.
So you think that an animal loses its native instincts when placed in a zoo? If that's the case, why are the lions still caged?

Quote:
No.
And if you read any of the research on gays in the animal kingdom, you wouldn't make such ridiculous comments.
You aren't even on the same track as what we're talking about.
These two bonded together. They rejected the advances of female penguins.
They created a nest together, and raised a child together.

And to ignore those facts, you try to mock the idea by talking about other nonsense that has absolutely nothing to do with gay animals.
And your insistence on equating human traits to those of animals acting on instincts is absurd.

Quote:
Yeah.
GAY ANIMALS.
Look. I realize you prefer ignorance cause it's safe and cozy and Republican.
But it's like you're attacking the idea of what a "city over-pass" is by ridiculing a ditch.

I realize this is a futile attempt, but I'll make it anyways.
Here's one article describing SOME gay animals.
If you want to discuss it (and I know you don't), let me know.
Gay animals out of the closet? - LiveScience- msnbc.com
The fact that you're not the only one that engages in anthropomorphism isn't a surprise to me. Tell me, if a hard-core criminal in prison for life porks his cellmate because there are no women accessible, is he gay? Or is he being opportunistic? any port in the storm?
Quote:
Penguins have no predators in the zoo.
These two decided to nest together, acting as a couple.
What you don't seem to grasp is that people typically THINK the gay penguin couples are "male/female" cause it's hard to identify penguin gender unless you get a close physical exam of the animal.
They THINK the GAY COUPLE is a straight couple cause the two behave as a male/female bonded couple would.

And by your lack of logic, you would have people go from "oh look! it's a mommy and daddy penguin" to "oh wait. they're both male? well I guess they're just doing that to protect themselves from non-existent zoo predators"...
Again, animals don't lose their instincts just because they're in a zoo.
Quote:
So claimeth you, the person who refuses to look at what they really do.
Look. I realize you love to make things up to justify your view of the world. It's very convenient of you to pretend to "know" things and not seek the truth.
I've yet to see a male penguin carry a purse or wear a bolo.
Quote:
But if a male/female couple acted like this, THEY WOULD BE called a "heterosexual couple".
If a male/female couple bonded exclusively together, making a nest for the two of them together, and raised a child together, they would be called straight.
They would be considered "normal" because they were exhibiting normal behavior patterns.
Quote:
The fact that you refuse to recognize the same behavior between a same-gender couple as "homosexual" only demonstrates the absurdity of the anti-gay mindset.
And your insistence in claiming homosexuality is normal and acceptable because animals have participated in homosexual acts is at least equally absurd.
__________________
I'll keep my guns and my money. You can keep your "Change".

"We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there's trouble in Massachusetts, there's trouble everywhere -- and now they know it." Senator Scott Brown (R MA)
Reply With Quote
  #130 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 12:54 PM
Matthew S's Avatar
Gay Crusader
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,022
Send a message via Yahoo to Matthew S
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archangel View Post


HUmm interesting I understand that you may not quite understand this but when liberty is denied people do things. Liberty is being denied by said Christians. They have put into law their disgusting religious beliefs. You should be thankful that it is stopping protests and not church burnings, lynchings, and this from American history. Boston Tea Party - MSN Encarta
__________________
“While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do. Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans. It’s about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect.”

— Senator Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
  #131 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 04:34 PM
foundit66's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,913
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12 View Post
Answer a) If homosexuality was the norm, the majority of us would be homosexual.
Yeah. And if left-handed people were the norm, then the majority of us would be left-handed.
It's already been pointed out that this "interpretation" of "normal" is meaningless as a standard. Just cause something is the minority doesn't mean anything significant.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
Answer b) the population of people on earth would be dropping since homosexuals don't reproduce naturally.
Considering how over-populated heterosexuals have made this planet in the first place...

I always have to chuckle at the "if everybody was gay..." mentality.
It's an absurd argument based on an even more absurd premise.
If every organ in our body was a lung, we would all die.
We need diversity to get the human body functioning properly.

If all gays in the world turned "straight" tomorrow, overpopulation would increase.
MORE people going hungry.
MORE orphans.
MORE abortions.

There is an obvious "better" situation in a happy medium. Some heterosexuals, and some homosexuals.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
So you think that an animal loses its native instincts when placed in a zoo? If that's the case, why are the lions still caged?
Boring non-sequitur.
I'm still waiting on any evidence that animals "couple" in order to achieve protection from predators.

To put it bluntly, coupling to help against predators IS NOT a "native instinct"...


Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
And your insistence on equating human traits to those of animals acting on instincts is absurd.
Oh wow.
Ignoring my arguments and without explanation, labeling my argument as "absurd".



Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
The fact that you're not the only one that engages in anthropomorphism isn't a surprise to me. Tell me, if a hard-core criminal in prison for life porks his cellmate because there are no women accessible, is he gay? Or is he being opportunistic? any port in the storm?
And we've already been over this.
Articles CLEARLY DOCUMENT how this gay couple had females coming by to seek the attention of one of the penguins.
THEY REJECTED the attention of the female.

Seeking the attention of the same gender while REJECTING the sexual attention of the opposite gender is a clear sign of homosexuality.

Quite frankly, your "anthropomorphic" argument is meaningless.
You refuse to look at the EVIDENCE that exists regarding gay animals, and you continue to claim false conclusions on the research.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
Again, animals don't lose their instincts just because they're in a zoo.
That's not even a response to what I said.
You're failing to respond.

Like I said, when people didn't know the gender of these penguins, they ASSUMED they were a male-female couple.
CAUSE THEY ACTED like a male-female couple.
Is thinking penguins are "heterosexual" an "anthropomorphic" response too???


Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
I've yet to see a male penguin carry a purse or wear a bolo.
I have yet to see a gay male do that, so you're making a meaningless comment...


Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
They would be considered "normal" because they were exhibiting normal behavior patterns.
And with that, you just lost.
You admit the two male penguins are not "normal".
You repeatedly argue that homosexuality is not "normal".
Yet you refuse to admit that these two were acting as gay penguins...

Suppose Chris and Pat are acting a certain way.
If I told you that Chris was a girl and Pat was a guy, you would call them straight.
If I told you that Chris was a girl, and Pat was a girl, you would refuse to admit they were gay.



Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSartre12
And your insistence in claiming homosexuality is normal and acceptable because animals have participated in homosexual acts is at least equally absurd.
Your response is absurd, cause I have made NO SUCH STATEMENT.
What is it with the anti-gay being incapable of reading and comprehending?

First of all, NORMAL IS IRRELEVANT.
There are so many different standards and definitions for "normal" that it is meaningless to use the word.
Statistical definitions. Moral definitions. Judgment definitions.
A person could be saying "gays are not normal, therefore they are wrong".
Does that mean "gays are less than 50% of the population, therefore they are wrong"???
Does that mean "gays are immoral, therefore they are wrong"???
The word leads to meaningless arguments. It DOES NOT MATTER whether homosexuality is normal.

Secondly, I have never argued that gay animals make homosexuality "acceptable".
It's the same ol' confusion on the anti-gay side time and time again that it's downright pathetic!
I said the following in the third post of this thread, and some people STILL CANNOT GET IT...
Anti-gay poster: Homosexuality is wrong cause it's unnatural.
Pro-gay poster: One way your claim is flawed is because homosexuality IS natural. Animals do it.
Anti-gay poster: Wow. You think it's okay to do something just cause animals do it???

Now anybody who can string along a cogent thought should be able to recognize that the pro-gay poster said nothing of the sort.
If a person argues "Because of A, then B", and then A is shown to be false, then the original argument is shown as false.
Such an observation says NOTHING about the requirements of "B" or even "not B".

The sad part of this? I know I've explained this here before.
And regardless of how many times I explain it, you'll find a variety of people who just can't get it....
__________________
"Speak up; for he that withholds his opinion shall inherit the winds of tyranny"
*** www.politicalwrinkles.com
"Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution.
You did not place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."
*** Jamie Raskin
Reply With Quote
  #132 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 04:48 PM
Archangel's Avatar
The Sword of TRUTH
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the presence of the Master:
Posts: 10,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUNxTime View Post

Ok, first off, violence is bad and violent gays hurt their cause as much as violent people hurt any cause they support. However, I doubt I could come stand in front of YOUR church for 3 years (that's how long the woman said they've been going there) and demean and degrade Christianity and condemn you and your fellow parishioners without someone getting upset with me and shooing me outta there. Like any minority (perhaps one of the last truly oppressed minorities in the US) gays get touchy when they feel people are 'invading' their neighborhood. And for good reason. There is a real problem of 'gay bashing'.
You'll need to support this claim that these christians went there demeaning and degrading the homosexual community for years because that is a completely false accusation which even the homosexuals never made. They sung hymns and shared the gospel while never forcing it on anyone at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CxT
Ok, your first links are about Christians going into gay neighborhoods and basically trying to convert gays from their sinning lifestyle. Now your third link is about how its the GAYS who....
That link is evidence of the low-life and sleazy tactics which the gay agenda exemplifies at every turn. Why is it so hard for you to see that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CxT
Ok, well...yeah not my cup of tea. But what people do behind closed doors is their business and I'm not willing to force my sensibilities on what consenting adults do.
See the bolded CxT? Are you trying to infuriate me with such an inane statement or are you senile and you just forgot the topic of discussion? We are discussing the Folsom street fair in the Castro District. That takes place in public, in the street, you know, in broad daylight, to start at least. But don't worry, the debauchery goes on late into the night and it just gets more perverse as the day goes on. So it should bother you that children are exposed to it. Even looking down on it from their apartments as the perversion goes by in a steady stream through out the day and night. What disappoints me most though is that apparently you can't see any of this.
__________________
If god made human from dirt, how come there are still dirt around? ~ [obvious_child]

You know what, Archie is right. Evolution is a total scam. ~ [obvious_child]

If the universe were not as it is, it would be different. ~ [Penfold]

A great civilization is not conquered from without, until it destroys itself from within. ~ Durant
Reply With Quote
  #133 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 05:08 PM
Ripskar's Avatar
Blood-Axe Ork Warlord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Here be Dragons
Posts: 1,051
So religion gives your life "meaning and purpose"...
Specifically the purpose of spending 9 pages arguing about the whims of a penguin...
Is your life really that worthless?
__________________
The man who came from nowhere, to make absolutely no impact whatsoever.

Do litteralists have trouble with rhetorical questions?

evolutionism was not found in the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary
darwinism was not found in the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary
Reply With Quote
  #134 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 05:23 PM
Archangel's Avatar
The Sword of TRUTH
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the presence of the Master:
Posts: 10,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripskar View Post
So religion gives your life "meaning and purpose"...
Specifically the purpose of spending 9 pages arguing about the whims of a penguin...
Is your life really that worthless?
Just so you know, only 21 of the now 133 posts on this thread are mine. and I only have 4 pages of posts since I get 40 posts per page. So it's a lot of other people who have been arguing about these blasted Penguins also. Just so you know...
__________________
If god made human from dirt, how come there are still dirt around? ~ [obvious_child]

You know what, Archie is right. Evolution is a total scam. ~ [obvious_child]

If the universe were not as it is, it would be different. ~ [Penfold]

A great civilization is not conquered from without, until it destroys itself from within. ~ Durant
Reply With Quote
  #135 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 06:26 PM
Steamroller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archangel View Post
Just so you know, only 21 of the now 133 posts on this thread are mine. and I only have 4 pages of posts since I get 40 posts per page. So it's a lot of other people who have been arguing about these blasted Penguins also. Just so you know...
Pearls before Swine, Archangel. Pearls before Swine.....
__________________
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0