PRO

Political Debates and Polls Forum

CON


Go Back   4Forums.com Political Debates and Polls > Topics > Economics Debates

Corporate Welfare for Wal-mart in Oregon...: Walmart tops list of Oregon businesses with employees receiving public assistance By DON McINTOSH, Associate Editor Walmart is at the top of a list of Oregon employers whose workers receive food stamps and/or state-subsidized medical ...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Harvard Business Review Magazine Subscription People Magazine
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2010, 12:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 6,945
Corporate Welfare for Wal-mart in Oregon...

Quote:
Walmart tops list of Oregon businesses with employees receiving public assistance
By DON McINTOSH, Associate Editor
Walmart is at the top of a list of Oregon employers whose workers receive food stamps and/or state-subsidized medical coverage.

The Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS) agreed to compile such a list in response to concerns raised in 2007 by State Rep. Brad Witt (D-Clatskanie) and other legislators. The data are neither verified nor exhaustive, but DHS said the sample size was robust enough to ensure a large degree of confidence as to who the top 50 employers were that had large numbers of employees receiving public assistance: The list was compiled two years in a row, and almost all the same employers made the top 50 both years.

Walmart, which last year reported an 8.8 percent jump in profit to $14.4 billion on sales of $405 billion, topped the list both years, with 468 Oregon employees getting one or both forms of assistance in 2009, and 875 in 2008.

McDonalds, Taco Bell, Burger King, and Subway were in the top 10 both years, and their competitors weren’t far behind: In all, a dozen restaurant franchises were among the top 50 both years.
nwlaborpress.org | DHS lists top 50 employers with employees getting public assistance

I don't live in Oregon, but I suspect that my tax dollars are also going to corporate welfare for Wal-mart.
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan

“War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier

War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2010, 12:39 PM
JPSartre12's Avatar
Healthcare- I gots mine
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 8,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by simone View Post
nwlaborpress.org | DHS lists top 50 employers with employees getting public assistance

I don't live in Oregon, but I suspect that my tax dollars are also going to corporate welfare for Wal-mart.
You think that just maybe Walmart paid enough in taxes to cover that?


From Walmart's annual statement:

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Income tax paid $ 6.596 BILLION
__________________
"The problem with Socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money."
- Margaret Thatcher

"We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there's trouble in Massachusetts, there's trouble everywhere -- and now they know it." Senator Scott Brown (R MA)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2010, 03:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 191
Wal-Mart actually pays better than Target, as my wife found out. It's also the only major retailer than doesn't hire part-timers.

It's under no obligation to pay its employees more than market rates.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2010, 03:22 PM
JPSartre12's Avatar
Healthcare- I gots mine
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 8,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephdphillips View Post
Wal-Mart actually pays better than Target, as my wife found out. It's also the only major retailer than doesn't hire part-timers.

It's under no obligation to pay its employees more than market rates.
Pay Simone no mind. It's typical for union-loving leftists to bag on Walmart.
__________________
"The problem with Socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money."
- Margaret Thatcher

"We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there's trouble in Massachusetts, there's trouble everywhere -- and now they know it." Senator Scott Brown (R MA)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2010, 11:25 AM
E Mutz's Avatar
Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 479
Quote:
Walmart, which last year reported an 8.8 percent jump in profit to $14.4 billion on sales of $405 billion, topped the list both years, with 468 Oregon employees getting one or both forms of assistance in 2009, and 875 in 2008.

McDonalds, Taco Bell, Burger King, and Subway were in the top 10 both years, and their competitors weren’t far behind: In all, a dozen restaurant franchises were among the top 50 both years.
What do these employers have in common? A large pool of largely unskilled younger workers. These are by definition the ones on the lowest rung of the economic ladder. It is not the responsibility of corporations to recompense a laborer more than his skill set would warrant. It is incumbent, rather upon that laborer to develop some marketable skill that would demand higher compensation. Constructing a sandwich or stocking a shelf are not terribly difficult jobs to master and thus there is a large labor pool competing for these jobs. The law of supply and demand indicates that you will not get wildly compensated for flipping burgers.
__________________
Mutz (E)

Your Life Is Not My Fault
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2010, 11:40 AM
JPSartre12's Avatar
Healthcare- I gots mine
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 8,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by E Mutz View Post
What do these employers have in common? A large pool of largely unskilled younger workers. These are by definition the ones on the lowest rung of the economic ladder. It is not the responsibility of corporations to recompense a laborer more than his skill set would warrant. It is incumbent, rather upon that laborer to develop some marketable skill that would demand higher compensation. Constructing a sandwich or stocking a shelf are not terribly difficult jobs to master and thus there is a large labor pool competing for these jobs. The law of supply and demand indicates that you will not get wildly compensated for flipping burgers.
Mutz, you old war horse! It's about time that you stepped away from the girl's club and posted here.
__________________
"The problem with Socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money."
- Margaret Thatcher

"We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there's trouble in Massachusetts, there's trouble everywhere -- and now they know it." Senator Scott Brown (R MA)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0