Giving the bailout money to companies that AREN'T failing? I don't agree with the bailouts in the first place, but I don't think there's a chance it isn't going to happen. So, why would you give taxpayer money to companies that have already shown they are unable to stay in business? This is the exact sort of behavior that led to the problem in the first place, only on a much larger scale. Is this a stupid idea?
Rewarding Failure and Punishing Success seems to be the M.O. nowadays!
-Monthly internet connection $35.00
-Monthly electricity bill $245.00
-Convincing a Socialist that incentive is the mother of motivation,
This makes me want to hurl.
And, BTW, the comment about "A congressman isn't the one that actually handles the money of a district" is simply a straw man.