PRO

Political Debates and Polls Forum

CON


Go Back   4Forums.com Political Debates and Polls > Topics > Crime Debates

Right Wing Fearmongers Are Raping Us!: Rupert Murdoch's gang of mind rapists on Fox. Rush Limbaugh. The thousands of others who daily pollute the publicly-owned airwaves and rape the minds of unsuspecting Americans who obligingly bend over and get nailed over ...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Time Magazine Subscription People Magazine
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 6,945
Right Wing Fearmongers Are Raping Us!

Rupert Murdoch's gang of mind rapists on Fox.

Rush Limbaugh.

The thousands of others who daily pollute the publicly-owned airwaves and rape the minds of unsuspecting Americans who obligingly bend over and get nailed over and over again.
Quote:
America lets radio and TV broadcasters use public airwaves worth more than half a trillion dollars for free. In return, we require that broadcasters serve the public interest: devoting at least some airtime for worthy programs that inform voters, support local arts and culture and educate our children — in other words, that aspire to something beyond just minimizing costs and maximizing revenue.

Using the public airwaves is a privilege — a lucrative one — not a right, and I fear the F.C.C. has not done enough to stand up for the public interest. Our policies should reward broadcasters that honor their pledge to serve that interest and penalize those that don’t.

The F.C.C. already has powerful leverage to hold broadcasters to their end of the bargain. Every eight years, broadcasters must prove that they have served the public interest in order to get license renewal. If they can’t, the license goes to someone else who will. It’s a tough but fair system — if the commission does its job.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/02/opinion/02copps.html

Is the public being served by this endless, repetitious rape?
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan

“War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier

War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 01:14 PM
gansao's Avatar
Sarah says reload
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Near London ,England
Posts: 3,110
Rape?.....
__________________
When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing—they believe in anything
G.K.Chesterton

From:Kevin Trenberth U.S climate expert.
Date:Mon,12 Oct,2009

The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't.
(In an email debate over a BBC report on the apparent dip in global warming since 2001)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 01:54 PM
OldSarge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the Keystone State
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by gansao View Post
Rape?.....
Only in her sick tortured mind.
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents.
If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem.
Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 01:56 PM
OldSarge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the Keystone State
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by simone View Post
Rupert Murdoch's gang of mind rapists on Fox.

Rush Limbaugh.

The thousands of others who daily pollute the publicly-owned airwaves and rape the minds of unsuspecting Americans who obligingly bend over and get nailed over and over again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/02/opinion/02copps.html

Is the public being served by this endless, repetitious rape?
Simone get some help before you become a danger to others. If you don't like what they say don't listen. Other wise one would get the idea you want to tear up the first amendment. Of course to a leftist conservatives need not apply.
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents.
If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem.
Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 02:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 6,945
Rush Libaugh and the right wing extremists on Fox are the ones yipping and yapping about rape all the time.

I just think that their yipping and yapping about rape all the time is rape.
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan

“War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier

War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 02:32 PM
OldSarge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the Keystone State
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by simone View Post
Rush Libaugh and the right wing extremists on Fox are the ones yipping and yapping about rape all the time.

I just think that their yipping and yapping about rape all the time is rape.
the question for you is do they have a right to?
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents.
If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem.
Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 02:42 PM
Ethmi's Avatar
Night-Elf Mohawk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSarge View Post
the question for you is do they have a right to?
Since when was it fair in the eyes of the left that both sides can speak their views?
__________________
My imaginary friend left me. He said his other friends didn't believe in me.

Spending our way out of the recession is like drinking our way out of alcoholism.

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government."
~ Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 03:00 PM
OldSarge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the Keystone State
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethmi View Post
Since when was it fair in the eyes of the left that both sides can speak their views?
You do have a valid point there. Conservatives need not apply.
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents.
If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem.
Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 03:04 PM
Ethmi's Avatar
Night-Elf Mohawk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSarge View Post
You do have a valid point there. Conservatives need not apply.
Obama wants the government to control the internet to make it more "fair". Any retard with access to the internet can express any idea, any view, any opinion to anyone across the world. Liberals, what exactly is unfair about that? How could it possibly get more "fair"?
__________________
My imaginary friend left me. He said his other friends didn't believe in me.

Spending our way out of the recession is like drinking our way out of alcoholism.

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government."
~ Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 06:49 PM
OldSarge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the Keystone State
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethmi View Post
Obama wants the government to control the internet to make it more "fair". Any retard with access to the internet can express any idea, any view, any opinion to anyone across the world. Liberals, what exactly is unfair about that? How could it possibly get more "fair"?
Well those evil conservatives with their mind rape have a say. That's just not fair!
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents.
If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem.
Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:56 PM
marc9000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern Ky.
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by simone View Post
Rupert Murdoch's gang of mind rapists on Fox.

Rush Limbaugh.

The thousands of others who daily pollute the publicly-owned airwaves and rape the minds of unsuspecting Americans who obligingly bend over and get nailed over and over again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/02/opinion/02copps.html

Is the public being served by this endless, repetitious rape?
As if the NY Times had room to talk about a requirement to "serve the public interest".

Welcome to TimesWatch
__________________
Why is it that our children can't read a Bible in school, but they can in prison?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2009, 11:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 6,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc9000 View Post
As if the NY Times had room to talk about a requirement to "serve the public interest".

Welcome to TimesWatch
The New York Times is a privately-owned entity. Ya remember the basics of the principals of privately-owned property? The marketplace will determine the destiny of the Times. Ya remember the concept of the "free market"?

The public airwaves are the public's airwaves and the public's interest should be considered.
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan

“War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier

War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2009, 11:38 AM
OldSarge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the Keystone State
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by simone View Post
The New York Times is a privately-owned entity. Ya remember the basics of the principals of privately-owned property? The marketplace will determine the destiny of the Times. Ya remember the concept of the "free market"?

The public airwaves are the public's airwaves and the public's interest should be considered.
Gosh and Fox and company aren't privately owned? Yes I guess that negates the first amendment then huh baby. We don't like what you say so therefore we censor you in the public forum. Tell us what other civil rights for conservatives are you wanting to remove?
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents.
If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem.
Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2009, 11:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 6,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSarge View Post
Gosh and Fox and company aren't privately owned? Yes I guess that negates the first amendment then huh baby. We don't like what you say so therefore we censor you in the public forum. Tell us what other civil rights for conservatives are you wanting to remove?
Fox is primarily on cable, not the public airwaves.

Limbaugh, however, spews his swill thousands and thousands of times each day over my public airwaves and people like me, a majority of the American people, are given no opportunity to respond because of the monopolies in U.S. media, and the fact that these monopolies are not obliged to honor the public interest as they did before Reagan killed the idea of "public interest."
__________________
Brother, you can believe in stones as long as you do not hurl them at me. Wafa Sultan

“War is an American way to teach geography,” British soldier

War is sweet to those who have not tasted it, but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach. – Pindar
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2009, 12:32 PM
OldSarge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the Keystone State
Posts: 2,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by simone View Post
Fox is primarily on cable, not the public airwaves.

Limbaugh, however, spews his swill thousands and thousands of times each day over my public airwaves and people like me, a majority of the American people, are given no opportunity to respond because of the monopolies in U.S. media, and the fact that these monopolies are not obliged to honor the public interest as they did before Reagan killed the idea of "public interest."
Translation: public interest = censorship! I hate to break it to you simone but you are not in any way shape or form the majority. Otherwise liberal talk radio would succeed beyond your wildest dreams. Yet it doesn't and the much famed Air Amerika is still in the toilet. remember the free market?

Any how you are trying to avoid the question simone baby. The question for you is do they have a right to free speech? Its a yes or no question baby. Then maybe you can get around to the next one. Tell us what other civil rights for conservatives are you wanting to remove?
__________________
The left lost the ability, use logic or know what truth is with the embrace of moral relativism. Thus you get moral equivalence between acts like detaining terrorists and cutting off heads of innocents.
If lawmakers and anti-gun groups were serious about reducing or ending gun crimes, they would turn their wrath toward the criminals. As it is, their efforts are not the solution to gun crimes they are part of the problem.
Even if you gave liberals the answers on an ethics exam, they’d fail.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0