Results 1 to 3 of 3
Contra passive, mechanical cellular acceptance of random mutations: ** See-- http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0524145045.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0809130025.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0628183251.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1030101503.htm Doesn't sound all that passive, mechanical, unaware, value-free, unintentional and linear to me....
  1. #1
    wascallywabbit Guest

    Contra passive, mechanical cellular acceptance of random mutations


  2. #2
    chemist99a's Avatar
    chemist99a is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,765
    Before you get into this next level of complexity its advisable that you understand the basics. You cannot even read these articles with understanding if you do not understand the basic elements of DNA structure and protein biosynthesis.

  3. #3
    Peeling is offline Zerg is the new cat.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,065
    Quote Originally Posted by wascallywabbit View Post
    Doesn't sound all that passive, mechanical, unaware, value-free, unintentional and linear to me.
    More evidence of physical, material, chemical 'bits of stuff' doing the jobs you insist vitality is necessary for. You really don't seem to be thinking this through. What you need in order to infer Vitality is for DNA to inexplicably, magically, acausally 'fix itself' in a way that defies all the known laws of physics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •