Quote:
Originally Posted by Steeeeve
The CMPA, a sub-group of George Mason University (a public Virginia University) had the same results as the Pew study. Are you going to claim they are both biased?
Get a real argument instead of attacking a reputable source.
|
That's funny.
You argue they aren't biased, as a form of credential.
When I show they are, you complain...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steeeeve
I'm glad you pointed those out...you can't talk about Pew being too biased now which you probably will anyway.
|
And when you're wrong, that will have absolutely no effect on your attitude...
But regarding those polls which Pew did that made some conclusions on Fox News, you have no comment.
Now that I pointed that out, are you still going to refuse comment?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steeeeve
|
Wow dude.
I LINKED TO THAT STUDY in the very post you responded to.
You cut and paste around me doing that, and then continue with the snide "I know you can do it"???
That's really impressive...
Not!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steeeeve
Now that you have been shown to be wrong you turn your argument to something different. Interesting. By the way, Pew found NBC to be the nicest to Palin.
|
There is no "change" here Steeeeve.
You didn't fully represent what the "studies"
actually consisted of.
I commented earlier on BIAS studies, generically.
You offer a study on election news coverage. Very specific.
I obviously couldn't comment on what you hadn't shown until you gave some specifics about what you were alluding too...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steeeeve
You mean like trying to claim bias level based upon a news channel breaking an interview for something stupid?
|
Dude.
You can obfuscate all you like. The POINT of the interview was obviously biased based on the very questions being asked.
When the representative was obviously kicking the reporter's butt, the reporter utilized a FALSE excuse to end the interview.
Now, I realize that some people will never admit what happened.
But in the end, I think you're going to have a harder time trying to get others to join those to stick their head in the sand and refuse to recognize what just happened...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steeeeve
Based upon nothing more than your own bias?
|
Why did the reporter lie?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steeeeve
Surely you aren't quoting a study from a group you literally just said was biased earlier in your post. HAHA, that is unreal...even from you. And I believe this study is accurate just as I believe their final study is accurate about Fox News being the most unbiased.
|
Biased in the favor of conservatives.
If you have a liberal giving criticism to liberals, the problem of "bias" is obviously mitigated.
When you have a conservative giving criticism to conservatives, again the problem of "bias" is mitigated.
Say you have a mother who loves her kids.
The mother is put on the stand to testify, and she says her kid could not have committed the crime. The D.A. could legitimately question whether or not her bias is a problem.
But if the same mother (who loves her kid) gets on the stand and admits that the child IS CAPABLE of committing the crime in question, do you think anybody is going to say "but she's biased" when the "bias" problem would point her in a different direction???
Surely I shouldn't have to explain that...