LOL. Penfold (and I) are discussing the reasons for why Animism assigned its animistic beliefs and thus its core logic. You are stuck at the surface as to why Animism did rather than move below the superficial into its core logic and principles. Instead of talking about why you are only talking about what. Hence why we laugh at you. You are trying to argue that the superficial appearance of Animism negates our arguments about the primary core logic and principles of why Animism did what it did. You are arguing that the ocean is calm by looking at the surface while we are discussing the turbulence of underwater currents. We move below the surface, while you are stuck.

Arch just doesn't understand what we are talking about.

But that's pretty much normal.

You still don't get the fundamental core logic.

I said this before: You fail to deal with the reason for this and the core logic it shares with Intelligent Design.

And you just don't get it.