04-05-2005, 11:50 AM
|
 |
Ill-tempered but colorful
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,282
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Duo_Maxwell
Let's play with this guy. It's clear his world history background can fit in a thimble.
IF racial intergration is genocide, why is it that latin America, a population made up of mixed blood consisting of native populations, Spanish, Portugese and a smaller number of other white Europeans is vastly populated? After all, it's been about 500 years of such racial intergration and they don't seem to have any problems with growing population, in fact, that seems to be the problem they face.
Huh. Seems contridictiory to such a argument.
Let's take it further,
IF racial intergration is genocide, why is it that the US, a mixing of races that would detail about a meg of forum space has one of the largest populations in the US?
|
I gather it is his racist position that a drop of "non-white" blood means you're not white and therefore lost to the "white" race. Race mixing leads to extinction of discreet "races". I still don't see how this applies to any of the U.N. requirements to be classified as "genocide". I say good riddance to "race consciousness".
__________________
"I am to eliminate all free radicals."
- James Bond
|